Let’s say that a compliance platform is $12,000 per annum. Does it cost a lot?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence gathering in a complex technology environment, $12,000 could be a wise investment. If a company of seven could gather the same evidence manually, in a couple of hours each month, the figure looks considerably different.
It is a great method to locate Vanta alternatives. Do not begin by asking what platform comes with the greatest features. Find out what features save your company in actual time and money.
Automation Has an Economic Break-Even Point
Automating compliance isn’t necessarily beneficial or harmful. The importance of automation for compliance is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has hundreds of employees multiple cloud environments, multiple applications, and constant access changes. The manual process of collecting evidence can be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence easily justify the cost.
Think about a company with 10 employees working on their first SOC 2. Its infrastructure may be relatively compact, and the evidence collection might be manageable with massive automation.
This is a crucial distinction in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. While an advanced platform could have a lot of features but they only have value when an organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata could quickly turn into an exercise in feature-by-feature. Both platforms are based on automation and integrated and therefore, companies seeking this type of approach will benefit from looking at the frameworks they support with their integrations, service along with individual quotations and contracts.
There’s a second decision you need to make. Does your business want an integration-driven platform for compliance or not? Some businesses favor continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence collection. Some businesses prefer to provide their own evidence, especially when their workload is small.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the same model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are lighter platforms which focus on organization and an extensive network of connectivity.
CertAssist is a member of the second group. CertAssist was created by compliance consultants, internal auditors as well as other experts, organizes controls frameworks in a central place. It lets you edit policies and guidelines for the auditing process, and allows auditors to look over evidence using read-only access.
It doesn’t intend to connect to operational systems nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence if they’ve chosen.
System Access is a consideration in the Making
It is obvious that removing integrations could have disadvantages. It is necessary to collect evidence by hand.
This means that there is no need to integrate, and the process of compliance is not dependent upon an interface to the operational environment.
Both are equally effective. It is crucial to determine what choices make sense for your business.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams with five to 200 employees and gives pricing information, instead of having the sales pitch. Its advertised launch price is $225 per month in contrast to a typical price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The requirements for a start-up with 10 employees are not necessarily exactly the same as a company with 100 or 500 employees.
A lighter platform can be beneficial while compliance stays easy. The costs of automation will grow as systems, staff and frameworks multiply. Let complexity play a role when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. They should be paid for only when the cost of doing the task they replace manually is higher.